Lacasa EL Ploma
Sudheer Kumar Gangireddy · Medchal-Malkajgiri · RERA P02200001203
Lacasa EL Ploma is a residential apartment project in Gajularamaram, Bachupally mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri district, developed by registered promoter Sudheer Kumar Gangireddy. It covers 593.61 sq m and comprises one proposed residential building with a Stilt + 5 floor configuration and 15 units; the home configuration was not filed. The project is registered under TG-RERA number P02200001203, with proposed completion on 3 April 2024.
01What we found
Read from TG-RERA filings, approvals, land and registration records and court records. A court case is counted only when the court record states this project's survey number with its village, or names the project.
02Check before you pay
8 items to check before you pay, 4 high - from the title chain, court records and approvals, each with what to ask the builder or your advocate. An item may not be a problem with the project: records can be incomplete.
Project at a glance
Project identity
| Item | Record |
|---|---|
| Registered project name | Lacasa EL Ploma RERA record |
| Project type / registered portion | Residential apartment project; one registered project/phase is identified in the supplied record. RERA record RERA filing |
| TG-RERA registration | P02200001203; issued 24 September 2019; stated validity through 3 April 2024. Registration validity is distinct from the completion deadline and does not establish an occupancy certificate. RERA record Approvals record |
| Registered promoter | Sudheer Kumar Gangireddy. Legal entity type is not established in the supplied identity record. RERA record Corporate record |
| RERA status in the supplied record | Registration certificate records the project’s registration; no extension is recorded in the supplied certificate. The stated registration period has ended. Approvals record |
Land and geographic identity
| Item | Record |
|---|---|
| Locality / revenue village | Locality: Gajularamaram; RERA identity fields separately record Pragathi Nagar as the village. The title documents describe Gajularamaram Village. The revenue-village identity is therefore not resolved by the supplied records. RERA record RERA filing Land records |
| Mandal / district / PIN | Bachupally mandal; Medchal-Malkajgiri district; PIN 500072. RERA record RERA filing |
| Survey and subdivisions | 307/E/A (also written Sy.No.307/E/A in the title material). RERA record Land records |
| Site area | Total area 593.61 sq m; net area 593.61 sq m; road-affected area recorded as 0 sq m in the building-permit extraction. RERA filing Land records |
| Plot identifiers | 124, 125, 126 part. RERA filing |
| Boundaries filed in RERA | North: 40 ft road; South: plots 145, 146, 147; East: neighbours’ land; West: plot 126 part. RERA filing |
Development identity
| Item | Record |
|---|---|
| Sanctioning authority | Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC). Approvals record |
| Principal building permission | Building Permit Order 2/C26/11488/2018, File No. 2/15B/07552/2018, dated 25 July 2018; the permit extraction states validity through 25 July 2024. Approvals record |
| Sanctioned building / use | One proposed residential building, named “PROPO BLDG (RESIDENCE)” in the permit extraction. |
| Sanctioned floor configuration | Stilt + 5; the permit table also records one stilt level and a residential entry of five floors. Height recorded as 14.90 m. No basement or podium is identified in the supplied permit extraction. |
| Approved built-up area | RERA project fields record 1,352.36 sq m approved built-up area; the GHMC permit extraction lists 1,352.60 under its residential sanctioned particulars. These are source-stated figures, not independently reconciled here. RERA filing |
| Unit count | RERA filing: 15 units, with 15 shown available and 0 booked in the supplied snapshot. The permit condition says the sanctioned unit count must not be increased without prior GHMC approval; its extracted table does not supply a clear unit total. RERA unit table RERA unit details |
Offering and status
| Item | Record |
|---|---|
| RERA-filed configuration | The unit table contains a row recorded as “2”, but the supplied normalized record classifies it as a non-sale configuration row, not a reliable home-type description. The supplied unit-details record says the home configuration was not filed. RERA unit table RERA unit details |
| RERA-filed saleable area | 30.04 sq m for the filed unit row; the record does not establish that this is a typical apartment configuration or a carpet-area measurement. RERA unit table RERA unit details |
| Bookings / availability | 0 booked; 15 available in the supplied TG-RERA-derived unit snapshot. No as-of date is attached to these counts, so they are indicative rather than a dated live inventory statement. RERA unit table RERA unit details |
| Completion dates | The RERA certificate records the registration period ending 3 April 2024; the project header records proposed completion 3 April 2024. Form B separately records a promoter undertaking to complete by 3 April 2021. RERA record |
| Construction and occupancy status | The supplied records do not establish current construction progress or an occupancy/completion certificate. The GHMC permit extraction records that completion was not certified and requires a completion notice and occupancy certificate. |
The project story
Lacasa EL Ploma is registered as a residential apartment project on 593.61 sq m in survey 307/E/A, with the RERA record identifying plots 124, 125 and 126 part. The project’s location is recorded around Gajularamaram/Pragathi Nagar in Bachupally mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri district; the supplied records do not settle the revenue-village naming consistently. RERA record RERA filing Land records
GHMC’s 2018 building permit describes one proposed residential building, Stilt + 5, with a recorded height of 14.90 m. The project is not described in the supplied material as a multi-tower, villa, plotted-layout or mixed-use development.
The RERA-derived unit snapshot lists 15 units, all shown as available and none booked, but carries no snapshot date. Its configuration information is incomplete: the supplied records do not establish a dependable home configuration or typical apartment plan. The supplied evidence also does not establish how much construction has been completed on site. The recorded completion date and the registration validity end date are not proof of completion or occupancy certification. RERA unit table RERA unit details RERA record
Master plan, architecture & building design
The project site is recorded as 593.61 sq m gross and net, with 0 sq m road-affected area in the building-permit extraction. The RERA project fields give approved built-up area as 1,352.36 sq m; the GHMC permit extraction lists 1,352.60 under residential sanctioned particulars. The available extract does not label either figure as carpet area or saleable area. RERA filing RERA filing
The GHMC permit identifies one residential building, Stilt + 5, and a height of 14.90 m. Its extracted particulars include a stilt area of 258.34 sq m and a compound wall of 90.14 RM. The permit identifies 25 trees, a garbage house, transformer space and 7 RWHPs (as abbreviated in the permit extraction). The extract does not establish detailed apartment layouts, flats per floor, lift or stair arrangements, building footprint, internal circulation, open-space distribution or phase-wise organization.
A floor-plan review record reports three drawings in total: one scan pending, two with no flats, and none measured. Accordingly, no software-measured carpet area or room dimensions are available in the supplied material. Floor plans
Homes, configurations & floor plans
| Units | 15 |
|---|---|
| Booked | 0 |
| Available | 15 |
| RERA saleable area | 30.04 sq m recorded for the filed row |
| Measured carpet area | Not available: no drawing was measured |
| Loading (if supplied) | Not supplied |
The unit count, booking count and saleable-area figure are from the supplied TG-RERA-derived unit record; the booking snapshot has no as-of date. The project records do not establish a reliable bedroom configuration or buyer-specific unit allocation. RERA unit table RERA unit details RERA unit table
No carpet-area measurement is available from the supplied drawings. A RERA saleable-area figure and a drawing-measured carpet area are different measures; the supplied records do not provide the latter or a loading figure for comparison. Floor plans RERA unit details
Parking & vehicle circulation
The GHMC permit states that the cellar and stilts approved for parking are to be used exclusively for vehicle parking, without partition walls or rolling shutters. The permit extraction identifies a stilt level, but does not give a parking-space count, vehicle-type breakdown, visitor or accessible allocation, or a parking layout. No basement is identified in the supplied floor description.
The supplied documents do not establish parking bay assignments to individual units, a ramp or driveway arrangement, mechanical parking, pedestrian separation, or EV charging. A promoter-filed mortgage area of 135.3 sq m is recorded in the project land fields, but it is not identified as a parking allocation. RERA filing Land records
Amenities, recreation & open spaces
The GHMC permit extraction records 25 trees, a garbage house, space for a transformer, 7 RWHPs, and a tot-lot entry of 0 sq m. The RERA-derived amenities table reports the following progress values; these are portal-reported percentages, not independent verification of completion. RERA amenities
| Facility | Description / size | Evidence source | Declared progress / verified status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internal roads & footpaths | No size supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Water supply | No source or capacity supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Sewerage (chamber, lines, septic tank, STP) | No capacity supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Storm-water drains | No size supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Green strip / tot-lot / park | GHMC permit lists tot-lot 0 sq m and 25 trees | RERA-derived amenities record; GHMC permit extraction | Amenities record: 0%; not independently verified |
| Street lighting | No details supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Community buildings | No facility or size supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Treatment and disposal of sewage and sullage water | No system capacity supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Solid-waste management and disposal | Permit extraction lists a garbage house; no capacity supplied | RERA-derived amenities record; GHMC permit extraction | Amenities record: 0%; not independently verified |
| Water conservation / rainwater harvesting | Permit extraction lists 7 RWHPs; permit condition requires a rainwater-harvesting structure | RERA-derived amenities record; GHMC permit extraction | Amenities record: 100%; not independently verified |
| Energy management | No details supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Fire protection and fire safety | No system details supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Electrical meter room / sub-station / receiving station | GHMC permit requires space for a transformer; no capacity supplied | RERA-derived amenities record; GHMC permit extraction | Amenities record: 100%; not independently verified |
| Aggregate recreational open space | No area supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
Utilities, building services & safety
The GHMC permit requires a rainwater-harvesting structure, space for a transformer, and an ETP “as per standard specification.” It also records 7 RWHPs and a garbage house. These are permit-extraction details and conditions; the supplied records do not establish installation, capacity or completed operation.
The RERA-derived amenities record shows water supply, sewerage, storm-water drainage, sewage treatment/disposal, energy management and fire protection at 0%; it shows water conservation/rainwater harvesting and the electrical meter room/sub-station/receiving-station category at 100%. These are declared portal progress values, not independently verified completion. RERA amenities
No supplied project record specifies water source or storage, STP/ETP capacity, reuse arrangements, electrical supply or backup capacity, lift count or capacity, fire-system details, CCTV/access control, accessibility provisions or EV charging. The permit states that an occupancy certificate is compulsory before occupation and requires a completion notice after construction.
Location, access & connectivity
The RERA identity places the project in the Gajularamaram locality, while the village field records Pragathi Nagar; the title and building-permit documents refer to Gajularamaram Village. The listed mandal is Bachupally, district Medchal-Malkajgiri, PIN 500072. The project’s RERA-recorded northern boundary is a 40 ft road. RERA record RERA filing RERA filing Land records
The supplied location data gives a geocoded point for Gajularamaram and a distance of 10.4 km to HITEC City. It does not provide an independently measured route or travel time. The permit extraction separately records an 18 mt. road width in its approval particulars. Location record
No verified public-transport or landmark distances are established in the supplied project record.
Developer & development status
The registered promoter is Sudheer Kumar Gangireddy. The supplied corporate record identifies the entity type as unknown; the RERA fields describe the promoter organization as “Others,” with the description “Individuals.” No registered-office address or official contact details for the legal promoter are established beyond the address fields in the RERA record. RERA record Corporate record RERA filing
The GHMC building-permit application identifies GANGIREDDY SUDHEER KUMAR AND OTHERS as applicant. Form B is a promoter affidavit naming Krishna Mohan Reddy, Sudheer Kumar, K. Padmaja and P. Deepak Kumar as declarants/promoters, and states a completion undertaking of 3 April 2021. These are document-stated parties and a promoter declaration, respectively.
The project header records proposed completion as 3 April 2024, and the RERA certificate states registration validity through that date. The supplied evidence does not establish current construction progress, an extension, or an occupancy/completion certificate. RERA record
Approvals, official records & documents
| Record | Supplied evidence |
|---|---|
| TG-RERA registration | Form C for Lacasa EL Ploma, registration P02200001203, issued 24 September 2019, with stated validity through 3 April 2024. |
| GHMC building permission | Building Permit Order 2/C26/11488/2018, File No. 2/15B/07552/2018, dated 25 July 2018; survey 307/E/A; proposed residential building. Approvals record |
| Form B promoter declaration | Affidavit-cum-declaration dated 9 April 2019; includes the named declarants and a completion undertaking by 3 April 2021. |
| Title report and deed material | Advocate’s title search report, Doc. 44766; sale-deed material in Docs. 59461 and 59465. Document index |
| Encumbrance statements | Project-filed encumbrance statements, Docs. 23351 and 47060. Document index |
| Other RERA-filed records | A sale-agreement template is recorded as Doc. 62250; the supplied material does not establish a buyer-specific executed agreement. Document index |
| Layout lookup | No layout number is supplied in the RERA land record; the HMDA approved-layout lookup was unavailable in the supplied research record. HMDA |
Project at a glance
Project identity
Registered project name: Lacasa EL Ploma
Project type / registered portion: Residential apartment project; one registered project/phase is identified in the supplied record.
TG-RERA registration: P02200001203; issued 24 September 2019; stated validity through 3 April 2024. Registration validity is distinct from the completion deadline and does not establish an occupancy certificate.
Registered promoter: Sudheer Kumar Gangireddy. Legal entity type is not established in the supplied identity record.
RERA status in the supplied record: Registration certificate records the project’s registration; no extension is recorded in the supplied certificate. The stated registration period has ended.
Land and geographic identity
Locality / revenue village: Locality: Gajularamaram; RERA identity fields separately record Pragathi Nagar as the village. The title documents describe Gajularamaram Village. The revenue-village identity is therefore not resolved by the supplied records.
Mandal / district / PIN: Bachupally mandal; Medchal-Malkajgiri district; PIN 500072.
Survey and subdivisions: 307/E/A (also written Sy.No.307/E/A in the title material).
Site area: Total area 593.61 sq m; net area 593.61 sq m; road-affected area recorded as 0 sq m in the building-permit extraction.
Plot identifiers: 124, 125, 126 part.
Boundaries filed in RERA: North: 40 ft road; South: plots 145, 146, 147; East: neighbours’ land; West: plot 126 part.
Development identity
Sanctioning authority: Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC).
Principal building permission: Building Permit Order 2/C26/11488/2018, File No. 2/15B/07552/2018, dated 25 July 2018; the permit extraction states validity through 25 July 2024.
Sanctioned building / use: One proposed residential building, named “PROPO BLDG (RESIDENCE)” in the permit extraction.
Sanctioned floor configuration: Stilt + 5; the permit table also records one stilt level and a residential entry of five floors. Height recorded as 14.90 m. No basement or podium is identified in the supplied permit extraction.
Approved built-up area: RERA project fields record 1,352.36 sq m approved built-up area; the GHMC permit extraction lists 1,352.60 under its residential sanctioned particulars. These are source-stated figures, not independently reconciled here.
Unit count: RERA filing: 15 units, with 15 shown available and 0 booked in the supplied snapshot. The permit condition says the sanctioned unit count must not be increased without prior GHMC approval; its extracted table does not supply a clear unit total.
Offering and status
RERA-filed configuration: The unit table contains a row recorded as “2”, but the supplied normalized record classifies it as a non-sale configuration row, not a reliable home-type description. The supplied unit-details record says the home configuration was not filed.
RERA-filed saleable area: 30.04 sq m for the filed unit row; the record does not establish that this is a typical apartment configuration or a carpet-area measurement.
Bookings / availability: 0 booked; 15 available in the supplied TG-RERA-derived unit snapshot. No as-of date is attached to these counts, so they are indicative rather than a dated live inventory statement.
Completion dates: The RERA certificate records the registration period ending 3 April 2024; the project header records proposed completion 3 April 2024. Form B separately records a promoter undertaking to complete by 3 April 2021.
Construction and occupancy status: The supplied records do not establish current construction progress or an occupancy/completion certificate. The GHMC permit extraction records that completion was not certified and requires a completion notice and occupancy certificate.
The project story
Lacasa EL Ploma is registered as a residential apartment project on 593.61 sq m in survey 307/E/A, with the RERA record identifying plots 124, 125 and 126 part. The project’s location is recorded around Gajularamaram/Pragathi Nagar in Bachupally mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri district; the supplied records do not settle the revenue-village naming consistently.
GHMC’s 2018 building permit describes one proposed residential building, Stilt + 5, with a recorded height of 14.90 m. The project is not described in the supplied material as a multi-tower, villa, plotted-layout or mixed-use development.
The RERA-derived unit snapshot lists 15 units, all shown as available and none booked, but carries no snapshot date. Its configuration information is incomplete: the supplied records do not establish a dependable home configuration or typical apartment plan. The supplied evidence also does not establish how much construction has been completed on site. The recorded completion date and the registration validity end date are not proof of completion or occupancy certification.
Master plan, architecture & building design
The project site is recorded as 593.61 sq m gross and net, with 0 sq m road-affected area in the building-permit extraction. The RERA project fields give approved built-up area as 1,352.36 sq m; the GHMC permit extraction lists 1,352.60 under residential sanctioned particulars. The available extract does not label either figure as carpet area or saleable area.
The GHMC permit identifies one residential building, Stilt + 5, and a height of 14.90 m. Its extracted particulars include a stilt area of 258.34 sq m and a compound wall of 90.14 RM. The permit identifies 25 trees, a garbage house, transformer space and 7 RWHPs (as abbreviated in the permit extraction). The extract does not establish detailed apartment layouts, flats per floor, lift or stair arrangements, building footprint, internal circulation, open-space distribution or phase-wise organization.
A floor-plan review record reports three drawings in total: one scan pending, two with no flats, and none measured. Accordingly, no software-measured carpet area or room dimensions are available in the supplied material.
Homes, configurations & floor plans
| Units | 15 |
|---|---|
| Booked | 0 |
| Available | 15 |
| RERA saleable area | 30.04 sq m recorded for the filed row |
| Measured carpet area | Not available: no drawing was measured |
| Loading (if supplied) | Not supplied |
The unit count, booking count and saleable-area figure are from the supplied TG-RERA-derived unit record; the booking snapshot has no as-of date. The project records do not establish a reliable bedroom configuration or buyer-specific unit allocation.
No carpet-area measurement is available from the supplied drawings. A RERA saleable-area figure and a drawing-measured carpet area are different measures; the supplied records do not provide the latter or a loading figure for comparison.
Parking & vehicle circulation
The GHMC permit states that the cellar and stilts approved for parking are to be used exclusively for vehicle parking, without partition walls or rolling shutters. The permit extraction identifies a stilt level, but does not give a parking-space count, vehicle-type breakdown, visitor or accessible allocation, or a parking layout. No basement is identified in the supplied floor description.
The supplied documents do not establish parking bay assignments to individual units, a ramp or driveway arrangement, mechanical parking, pedestrian separation, or EV charging. A promoter-filed mortgage area of 135.3 sq m is recorded in the project land fields, but it is not identified as a parking allocation.
Amenities, recreation & open spaces
The GHMC permit extraction records 25 trees, a garbage house, space for a transformer, 7 RWHPs, and a tot-lot entry of 0 sq m. The RERA-derived amenities table reports the following progress values; these are portal-reported percentages, not independent verification of completion.
| Facility | Description / size | Evidence source | Declared progress / verified status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internal roads & footpaths | No size supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Water supply | No source or capacity supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Sewerage (chamber, lines, septic tank, STP) | No capacity supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Storm-water drains | No size supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Green strip / tot-lot / park | GHMC permit lists tot-lot 0 sq m and 25 trees | RERA-derived amenities record; GHMC permit extraction | Amenities record: 0%; not independently verified |
| Street lighting | No details supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Community buildings | No facility or size supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Treatment and disposal of sewage and sullage water | No system capacity supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Solid-waste management and disposal | Permit extraction lists a garbage house; no capacity supplied | RERA-derived amenities record; GHMC permit extraction | Amenities record: 0%; not independently verified |
| Water conservation / rainwater harvesting | Permit extraction lists 7 RWHPs; permit condition requires a rainwater-harvesting structure | RERA-derived amenities record; GHMC permit extraction | Amenities record: 100%; not independently verified |
| Energy management | No details supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Fire protection and fire safety | No system details supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
| Electrical meter room / sub-station / receiving station | GHMC permit requires space for a transformer; no capacity supplied | RERA-derived amenities record; GHMC permit extraction | Amenities record: 100%; not independently verified |
| Aggregate recreational open space | No area supplied | RERA-derived amenities record | 0%; not independently verified |
Utilities, building services & safety
The GHMC permit requires a rainwater-harvesting structure, space for a transformer, and an ETP “as per standard specification.” It also records 7 RWHPs and a garbage house. These are permit-extraction details and conditions; the supplied records do not establish installation, capacity or completed operation.
The RERA-derived amenities record shows water supply, sewerage, storm-water drainage, sewage treatment/disposal, energy management and fire protection at 0%; it shows water conservation/rainwater harvesting and the electrical meter room/sub-station/receiving-station category at 100%. These are declared portal progress values, not independently verified completion.
No supplied project record specifies water source or storage, STP/ETP capacity, reuse arrangements, electrical supply or backup capacity, lift count or capacity, fire-system details, CCTV/access control, accessibility provisions or EV charging. The permit states that an occupancy certificate is compulsory before occupation and requires a completion notice after construction.
Location, access & connectivity
The RERA identity places the project in the Gajularamaram locality, while the village field records Pragathi Nagar; the title and building-permit documents refer to Gajularamaram Village. The listed mandal is Bachupally, district Medchal-Malkajgiri, PIN 500072. The project’s RERA-recorded northern boundary is a 40 ft road.
The supplied location data gives a geocoded point for Gajularamaram and a distance of 10.4 km to HITEC City. It does not provide an independently measured route or travel time. The permit extraction separately records an 18 mt. road width in its approval particulars.
No verified public-transport or landmark distances are established in the supplied project record.
Developer & development status
The registered promoter is Sudheer Kumar Gangireddy. The supplied corporate record identifies the entity type as unknown; the RERA fields describe the promoter organization as “Others,” with the description “Individuals.” No registered-office address or official contact details for the legal promoter are established beyond the address fields in the RERA record.
The GHMC building-permit application identifies GANGIREDDY SUDHEER KUMAR AND OTHERS as applicant. Form B is a promoter affidavit naming Krishna Mohan Reddy, Sudheer Kumar, K. Padmaja and P. Deepak Kumar as declarants/promoters, and states a completion undertaking of 3 April 2021. These are document-stated parties and a promoter declaration, respectively.
The project header records proposed completion as 3 April 2024, and the RERA certificate states registration validity through that date. The supplied evidence does not establish current construction progress, an extension, or an occupancy/completion certificate.
Approvals, official records & documents
TG-RERA registration: Form C for Lacasa EL Ploma, registration P02200001203, issued 24 September 2019, with stated validity through 3 April 2024.
GHMC building permission: Building Permit Order 2/C26/11488/2018, File No. 2/15B/07552/2018, dated 25 July 2018; survey 307/E/A; proposed residential building.
Form B promoter declaration: Affidavit-cum-declaration dated 9 April 2019; includes the named declarants and a completion undertaking by 3 April 2021.
Title report and deed material: Advocate’s title search report, Doc. 44766; sale-deed material in Docs. 59461 and 59465.
Encumbrance statements: Project-filed encumbrance statements, Docs. 23351 and 47060.
Other RERA-filed records: A sale-agreement template is recorded as Doc. 62250; the supplied material does not establish a buyer-specific executed agreement.
Layout lookup: No layout number is supplied in the RERA land record; the HMDA approved-layout lookup was unavailable in the supplied research record.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lacasa EL Ploma registered with Telangana RERA?
Yes. Lacasa EL Ploma is registered with the Telangana Real Estate Regulatory Authority as P02200001203; the registration status is New Project.
Who is the developer of Lacasa EL Ploma?
The promoter named in the RERA registration is Sudheer Kumar Gangireddy.
Where is Lacasa EL Ploma located?
Lacasa EL Ploma is in gajularamaram, Pragathi Nagar, Bachupally, Medchal-Malkajgiri, Telangana (500072).
When will Lacasa EL Ploma be completed?
The promoter's proposed date of completion filed with RERA is 03/04/2024. This is the promoter's declaration, not a guarantee.
More projects in Pragathi Nagar
