Golden County Annexe

1. Project at a glance

Project identity

Land and geographic identity

Development identity

Offering and status

2. The project story

• Golden County Annexe is registered with TG-RERA as a plotted development at Rampally, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. The HMDA document is an approval for a draft open-plot layout and gives a land-use breakdown comprising plotted area, open space, social infrastructure and layout roads. It also records a substantial area affected by a master-plan road. RERA record
• The HMDA approval identifies development works including internal water-supply pipelines, an overhead tank, electrical lines, street lights, a transformer, avenue planting, park development and rainwater-harvesting pits. It requires the applicant to complete development works within three years and includes conditions concerning access roads, roads and social-infrastructure land handover, and release of the final layout. The supplied record does not establish the current completion status of those works.
• The promoter’s filing records a proposed completion date, and its Form B contains a completion undertaking. Neither is independent evidence of on-site progress. No RERA inventory or project-specific site-progress measurement is supplied. The vendor describes the development as a villa community, but that description and its villa count are not established as the RERA-filed offering in the supplied record. RERA record Promoter website RERA unit table

3. Master plan, architecture & building design

• The available HMDA approval concerns an open-plot layout, not a building or apartment plan. Its land analysis records 119113.64 sq. m total site area, 44346.71 sq. m master-plan road-affected area, and 71524.2 sq. m net site area. The approved breakdown further identifies 46686.59 sq. m plotted area, 5373.36 sq. m open space, 1788.71 sq. m social infrastructure and 17674.88 sq. m layout roads.
• The RERA fields separately state 46686.59 sq. m as approved built-up area. The evidence does not include drawings or a measurement definition sufficient to describe building footprint, building count, floor configuration, dwelling arrangement or residential/commercial building distribution. No RERA-filed plot schedule or plot-count breakdown is supplied. RERA filing Document index Layout record
• The approval lists common septic tank/STP, internal water-supply pipelines, overhead tank, electrical supply lines, street lights, transformer, avenue plantation, park development and rainwater-harvesting pits as development provisions. Their listing is not evidence that each facility has been completed.

4. Homes, configurations & floor plans

• The supplied RERA evidence does not include plot inventory, plot-size bands, RERA configuration counts, booked or available counts, or RERA-filed saleable areas. The floor-plan record contains two drawings, both awaiting measurement; no software-measured carpet areas are available. RERA unit table Layout record Floor plans
• The vendor record lists the following villa configurations and saleable-area claims. These are vendor-listed, not RERA-filed areas or independently measured areas. Promoter website

• The vendor record also includes repeated entries for some configurations. No unit counts or drawing-based room dimensions are supplied, so this report does not infer a total inventory or treat the listed saleable areas as carpet areas. Promoter website Floor plans

5. Parking & vehicle circulation

• No sanctioned car-parking or two-wheeler-parking count, visitor or accessible-space provision, parking-level plan, ramps, driveway arrangement, EV charging installation status or unit-specific parking allocation is established in the supplied RERA documents. Document index
• The HMDA approval records 7030.03 sq. m of mortgage area and identifies plots mortgaged in favour of the Metropolitan Commissioner, HMDA; this is not a parking count or a unit parking allocation. RERA filing
• The vendor lists an optional EV fast-charging point, but the record does not establish that charging points are installed or allocated. Promoter website

6. Amenities, recreation & open spaces

The HMDA approval identifies layout components and proposed development provisions. Separately, the RERA amenity record marks some infrastructure items as available at 100%; these are recorded declarations, not independent site verification. RERA amenities

7. Utilities, building services & safety

• HMDA’s approval lists internal water-supply pipelines, an overhead tank, a common septic tank/STP, electrical supply lines, a transformer, street lighting and rainwater-harvesting pits as layout development provisions. The supplied record does not give capacities, water source, treatment details, sewage-reuse arrangements, electrical load or backup capacity, or independent evidence that these provisions are operational.
• The RERA amenity record declares water supply, sewerage, storm-water drains, street lighting, water conservation/rainwater harvesting and an electrical meter room/substation/receiving station at 100%. It records treatment and disposal of sewage and sullage, solid-waste management, energy management, and fire protection/fire-safety requirements at 0%; aggregate recreational open-space progress is also recorded as 0%. These are filing statuses, not independently verified completion findings. RERA amenities
• No project-specific fire-system design, fire-clearance document, accessible circulation plan, CCTV/security system, lift provision, waste-segregation plan or utility capacity schedule is supplied. The vendor lists security, CCTV, generator backup and smoke detectors/fire extinguishers in each house, but those are vendor claims and do not establish sanctioned or installed project systems. Promoter website Document index

8. Location, access & connectivity

• The official project identity places the development in Rampally, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, PIN 501301. The HMDA approval names Rampally-ORRGC Village. The RERA-filed boundary description is: east SY NO 686P; west SY NO 687P 688P; north SY NO 665P 670P; south VILLAGE BOUNDARY OF GHATKESAR. RERA record RERA filing
• HMDA’s approval requires roads to be opened for accessibility to neighbouring sites. The supplied official location data includes one connectivity record: Financial District (Nanakramguda), 1.2 km. The dataset labels the location coordinate as a cadastral parcel centroid; it is not stated as an independently surveyed project entrance. Location record
• The vendor separately claims proximity to the Outer Ring Road, Raheja/Infosys, Uppal, Pocharam IT Hub, Warangal Highway and other listed schools, hospitals and retail/leisure destinations. These are vendor-provided claims; no measured route distances or travel times for those destinations are supplied here. Promoter website

9. Developer & development status

• The registered promoter is MODI BUILDERS & INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, a company. The supplied RERA fields identify GSTIN 36AAFCM0052Q1Z9 and PAN ending 052Q. The promoter’s registered-office address is not fully established by the registration certificate extract; the project data also contains an address at ASHOKA HITECH CHAMBERS, ROAD NO 2, RAMPALLY, RAMPALLY, Keesara, Medchal-Malkajgiri, 501301. RERA record RERA filing RERA filing Parties record
• The Form B declaration is made by Sourabh Modi as managing director and authorised signatory, and records a promoter completion undertaking of 01-01-2028. The project header separately records proposed completion 01/05/2028. These are recorded as supplied; the evidence does not establish current on-site progress or an independently verified completion forecast. RERA record
• The vendor’s villa-community description and associated configuration claims are not treated as RERA-filed project inventory. No official contact details for the registered promoter are supplied in the available evidence. Promoter website Document index

10. Approvals, official records & documents

The public HMDA DPMS lookup is recorded as unavailable through the supplied evidence, so this Overview relies on the HMDA approval document filed with the RERA record rather than treating portal unavailability as an approval decision. HMDA